Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Katherine's avatar

Great post, Robyn. Verrry helpful. NO apologies necessary! Thank you.

Expand full comment
Redeemed Dissident's avatar

Perhaps the nicotine "addiction" issue is accepted and broadly believed because the industry perpetuated the myth for many years (to shift focus away from their manufacturing practices)....until it was discovered that it is the 600+ additional chemical additives that the tobacco companies are including in the finished products that are causing the pronounced addiction (similar in many ways, but obviously more detrimental, than caffeine addiction in coffee drinkers - many of whom can't start their day without satisfying their cravings for it). Also, a Harvard study https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/25/4/444 (as well as testimony from several of the large tobacco company executives regarding the fact that nicotine itself is not addictive) stating that it is not addictive would suffice to satisfy a person's curiosity. It is not good practice (so I concur) to use synthetic/imitation substances when natural alternatives can be found. But it is interesting to note that patients in hospitals who were considered far gone with "Long COVID" (the magical "virus:" no one has ever isolated or proven exists), when a nicotine patch was added to their "treatment" protocols, recovered. The nicotine patch is one of several recommendations, and (as he points out) nicotine "warnings" about "addiction" are not provided with eggplant, tomatoes, cauliflower, or potatoes -- all of which contain respectable amounts of nicotine as well and make great alternatives, along with the herb Lobelia, which has a very similar "match" to the nicotine receptors on our cells (if there are receptors in our cells for it, why would we not advantage ourselves of using them? See https://thedrardisshow.com/ and scroll down to the 3 hour "The Other "N" Word)....He, Dr Ed Group, Dr Ealy & Dr Jana Schmidt have done a remarkable job with their "Healing for the A.G.E.S." conferences [https://www.healingfortheages.com/] and their fairly recent acquisition of the more powerful microscopic equipment (like Universities & Pharma companies use - much more informative for nano - micro sized viewing than even the darkfield/brightfield microscopist's findings have shown) in order to both observe and validate the efficacy of their recommendations/remedies (understanding they're trying as much as possible to source these from nature, herbs, etc.) is a welcome addition for laypersons to begin understanding how their bodies work and how traditional Rockefeller-based medicine is criminal and actually harmful to humankind. In fact they've used their own blood/urine, etc., to conduct many of the initial tests. This (kind of circular) antagonistic exchange between accomplished, respected professionals reminds me of the current back-and-forth between Dr Ana Mihalcea (MD & PHD) and Dr Robert Young over EDTA versus "MasterPeace" -- a clintophile/zeolite product with marine plasma, in terms of toxic metal/microplastic chelation methods (Dr Ana contends that zeolite is an ideal platform for perpetuation of nanostructures in the blood/urine versus an effective chelator and the arguments against EDTA are complex but involve the delicate balance of replenishing what the solution will chelate out, along with the possibility of the deposits traveling versus exiting the body). As with many other publicly-available (at least for now - why is it that most of the major nations are either discontinuing the distribution and thereby use of tobacco products or heavily taxing them to limit their access if they have no medicinal benefits?) sources of information -- the consumer should do their own investigation and decide what, if any of the many remedies for the toxic build up (from chem trails, polluted air, water, soil and GMO plants and animals as well as fluoride in the water supply, glyphosate on even organic crops that are "dried"/dessciated using it), etc.... Keep publishing your best practices, and consulting based on your known results and remedies -- the battle for the "turf" of helping people can use as many alternative practitioners as it can get on its side -- the synergies are to the benefit of we the erstwhile long-terms victims of industrial-strength propaganda, "vaccines", pharmaceutical poisons and unneccesary radiation, organ removal, cancer from use of sunscreen and other cosmetics loaded with toxins, etc. The positive voice and convincing way in which you present your solutions works well for you. Taking the offense is not always a great expenditure of time, at least, in public forums where it can do more harm than good..... Just a thought.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts